--- description: Ontdek de plus- en minpunten van Basecamp en leer meer over de functies, de prijs en het gebruiksgemak van de software. Lees nuttige beoordelingen van geverifieerde gebruikers en ontdek vergelijkbare programma's op Capterra België. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Basecamp - Bekijk prijzen, reviews en scores - Capterra België 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startpagina](/) > [Samenwerkingssoftware](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Basecamp](/software/56808/basecamp) # Basecamp Canonical: https://www.capterra.be/software/56808/basecamp Pagina: 1 / 578\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.capterra.be/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) > Basecamp wordt door miljoenen mensen vertrouwd en plaatst alles wat je nodig hebt om werk te voltooien, op één plek. > > Oordeel: score van **4.3/5** door 14420 gebruikers. Hoge score voor **Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling**. ----- ## Overzicht ### Wie gebruikt Basecamp? Ondernemers, freelancers, kleine bedrijven en groepen binnen grote organisaties. ## Snelle statistieken en scores | Metriek | Beoordelen | Details | | **In totaal** | **4.3/5** | 14420 Reviews | | Gebruiksgemak | 4.3/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Klantenondersteuning | 4.3/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding | 4.2/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Functies | 4.2/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Aanbevelingspercentage | 80% | (8/10 Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling) | ## Over de leverancier - **Bedrijf**: Basecamp - **Locatie**: Chicago, VS - **Opgericht**: 1999 ## Commerciële context - **Beginprijs**: US$ 15,00 - **Prijsmodel**: (Gratis versie beschikbaar) (Gratis proefversie) - **Doelgroep**: Zelfstandig ondernemer, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementatie en platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Android (mobiel), iPhone (mobiel), iPad (mobiel) - **Ondersteunde talen**: Engels - **Beschikbare landen**: Afghanistan, Albanië, Algerije, Amerikaans-Samoa, Amerikaanse Maagdeneilanden, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua en Barbuda, Argentinië, Armenië, Aruba, Australië, Azerbeidzjan, Bahama’s, Bahrein, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, België en 207 meer ## Functies - @mentions - Aanpasbare sjablonen - Activiteit-/nieuwsfeed - Activiteitendashboard - Bestanden delen - Chatten/messaging - Communicatiebeheer - Discussions/Forums - Documentbeheer - Enquêtes en feedback - Ideeënbeheer - Kalenderbeheer - Live chatten - Messaging - Mijlpalen bijhouden - Mobiele toegang - Op rollen gebaseerde toestemmingen - Opdrachtenbeheer - Opmerkingen/notities - Priorisering - Projecten bijhouden - Projectplanning - Rapportage en statistieken - Rapportage/projecten volgen - Realtime chatten - Roadmaps van producten - Samenwerkingstools - Slepen en neerzetten - Sub-Task Management - Taakbeheer - Taakvoortgang bijhouden - Task Editing - Termijnbewaking - Third-Party Integrations - Tijd bijhouden - Toegangsopties/machtigingen - Voortgang bijhouden - Waarschuwingen/Meldingen - Workflowbeheer - Workflowconfiguratie - Zoeken/filteren ## Integraties (93 in totaal) - AgencyDots - Akita - Apideck - Asana - AssessTEAM - Bridge24 - BrightGauge - Calamari - Centreli - Claritee - ClicData - ClickUp - Clockify - CoSchedule Marketing Suite - Cyfe ... en 78 meer integraties ## Ondersteuningsopties - E-mail/helpdesk - Veelgestelde vragen/forum - Kennisbank - 24/7 (contact met medewerker) - Chatten ## Categorie - [Samenwerkingssoftware](https://www.capterra.be/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Gerelateerde categorieën - [Samenwerkingssoftware](https://www.capterra.be/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Project management tools](https://www.capterra.be/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Taakbeheer software](https://www.capterra.be/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [Teamcommunicatie software](https://www.capterra.be/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [Project management software voor de non-profitsector](https://www.capterra.be/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternatieven 1. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.be/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6050 reviews) 2. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.be/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9246 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.be/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15391 reviews) 4. [Asana](https://www.capterra.be/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13582 reviews) 5. [Trello](https://www.capterra.be/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23539 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Basecamp great for collaboration and project management" — 4.0/5 > **Damian** | *21 mei 2026* | Management non-profit organisaties | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Basecamp allows for great collaboration. Both internally and with external vendors. Good for project management and assigning tasks to members of a project group. Easy to have back and forth chat on a task/project and copy in others. > > **Minpunten**: Repetition of notification emails when an update on a project is made and a task is also allocated to someone. > > Great tool for team collaboration, organizing, delegating tasks, staying on track with project timeline/due dates and overall project management. ----- ### "Basecamp: Clarity and Communication Over Complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *23 april 2026* | Juridische dienstverlening | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: What I liked most about Basecamp was its simplicity and clarity. It’s designed to help teams stay organized without feeling overwhelmed. In particular: Clean, user‑friendly interface – Basecamp is easy to navigate, even for new users. Everything is laid out clearly, which reduces confusion and onboarding time. Focused approach to project management – Instead of endless features, Basecamp sticks to core tools like to‑do lists, message boards, schedules, and file sharing. This keeps teams focused on actual work. Strong communication structure – Centralized message boards and comment threads cut down on scattered emails and make it easier to follow conversations over time. Transparency and accountability – Everyone can see what’s happening, who’s responsible for what, and what’s coming next, which supports collaboration and ownership. Minimal setup and maintenance – Projects can be created and managed quickly without complex configuration or customization. Overall, the biggest strength of Basecamp is how it reduces noise and complexity, making it especially effective for teams that value clear communication and straightforward project tracking over heavy customization or advanced workflows. > > **Minpunten**: What I liked least about Basecamp was that its simplicity can also feel limiting, especially for more complex or fast‑moving teams. In particular: Limited advanced features – Basecamp intentionally avoids things like custom workflows, detailed task dependencies, or advanced reporting, which can make it feel restrictive for larger or more structured projects. Not ideal for complex project tracking – There’s no native support for things like Gantt charts, workload planning, or time tracking, which some teams rely on for visibility and deadlines. Flat structure can feel rigid – Since all projects follow the same basic setup, it’s harder to adapt Basecamp to different project types or processes. Fewer automation options – Compared to other project management tools, automation and integrations are relatively minimal, which can mean more manual follow‑up. Scaling challenges – As the number of projects and conversations grows, it can become harder to manage or surface priorities quickly. Overall, what I liked least wasn’t a flaw so much as a trade‑off: Basecamp prioritizes simplicity over flexibility. That works well for straightforward collaboration but can feel limiting for teams that need more structure, customization, or advanced tracking tools. > > My overall experience with Basecamp was positive and refreshing, especially for teams that value clarity, communication, and simplicity over complex project management frameworks. Basecamp excelled at keeping work organized and easy to follow. Its clean interface and straightforward structure made it easy for everyone on the team to understand where discussions were happening, what tasks were assigned, and what deadlines were coming up—without needing formal training or ongoing system management. Communication felt more intentional and less fragmented thanks to centralized message boards and discussion threads, which significantly reduced email back‑and‑forth. The platform encouraged a calmer, more focused way of working. By limiting features to the essentials, Basecamp helped prevent over‑planning and micromanagement. For smaller teams or projects with well‑defined goals, this approach supported collaboration and accountability without adding unnecessary overhead. However, the experience became less ideal as project complexity increased. The lack of advanced task dependencies, customization, reporting, or automation meant that more structured teams or deadline‑driven projects sometimes needed workarounds or supplementary tools. In those cases, Basecamp felt more suited to coordination and communication than detailed project tracking. Overall, I found Basecamp to be a strong collaboration tool that works best for teams seeking simplicity, transparency, and reduced noise. While it’s not built for highly complex project management, it delivers a smooth, user‑friendly experience that supports effective teamwork and clear communication. ----- ### "Small Scale Project Management" — 3.0/5 > **Matilda** | *12 mei 2026* | Hoger onderwijs | Aanbevelingsscore: 4.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: I like that it was fairly easy to set up different projects\! It was nice to see all to dos in one space and keep an eye on all the projects you're working on. > > **Minpunten**: It wasn't the best for complex projects. A lot of our projects can span multiple years and cross different teams and I found Basecamp lacked the infrastructure to allow us to easily work on these more complex projects. > > For the time I worked with it I found that we were able to successfully accomplish our projects but as our team and scope expanded, we ultimately out grew the abilities of Basecamp. ----- ### "Not the most user-friendly app" — 3.0/5 > **Caitie** | *27 maart 2026* | Gezondheid, wellness en fitness | Aanbevelingsscore: 6.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: I didn't find basecamp to be very user friendly, the interface is a bit scattered and confusing, and I didn't like the way it was organized. > > **Minpunten**: The interface, the difficulty of finding where things were, and the constant confusion when trying to navigate within the app. > > I wasn't impressed with basecamp overall. As mentioned I had a tough time finding where things were and staying organized in the app. ----- ### "The simple project management system a hectic billing team can at least stick with." — 4.0/5 > **Frank** | *26 april 2026* | Luxeartikelen en sieraden | Aanbevelingsscore: 9.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: All my team will need to work with is in one location and no one will need a tutorial to locate it. Such simplicity is actually worth something when individuals are working on things and not on learning software. > > **Minpunten**: Experienced two annoying bugs when sharing files with the team, where the attachments could not load. A glitch like that is difficult to ignore in a billing environment where accuracy of documents is a concern. > > Basecamp has introduced a serene organization to our project organization process at Kilarys. The calendar enables the financial deadlines to be visible and the flat pricing reduced the internal budget dialogue to a very short one. ----- Pagina: 1 / 578\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.capterra.be/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) ## Links - [Bekijk op Capterra](https://www.capterra.be/software/56808/basecamp) ## Deze pagina is beschikbaar in de volgende talen | Locatie | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Gestructureerde gegevens