--- description: Ontdek de plus- en minpunten van Learned en leer meer over de functies, de prijs en het gebruiksgemak van de software. Lees nuttige beoordelingen van geverifieerde gebruikers en ontdek vergelijkbare programma's op Capterra België. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Learned - Bekijk prijzen, reviews en scores - Capterra België 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startpagina](/) > [Performance management systemen](/directory/30061/performance-appraisal/software) > [Learned](/software/1080743/Learned) # Learned Canonical: https://www.capterra.be/software/1080743/Learned Pagina: 1 / 2\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.capterra.be/software/1080743/Learned?page=2) > Learned is software voor prestatiemanagement op basis van AI die beoordelingen van medewerkers automatiseert en zorgt voor objectieve feedbackprocessen. > > Oordeel: score van **4.6/5** door 7 gebruikers. Hoge score voor **Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling**. ----- ## Snelle statistieken en scores | Metriek | Beoordelen | Details | | **In totaal** | **4.6/5** | 7 Reviews | | Gebruiksgemak | 4.1/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Klantenondersteuning | 4.9/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding | 4.3/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Functies | 4.7/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Aanbevelingspercentage | 90% | (9/10 Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling) | ## Over de leverancier - **Bedrijf**: Learned ## Commerciële context - **Beginprijs**: € 8,00 - **Prijsmodel**: (Gratis proefversie) - **Doelgroep**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200 - **Implementatie en platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Chromebook (desktop), Android (mobiel), iPhone (mobiel), iPad (mobiel) - **Ondersteunde talen**: Duits, Engels, Frans, Nederlands, Pools, Portugees, Spaans, Tsjechisch - **Beschikbare landen**: Albanië, Andorra, Belarus, België, Bosnië en Herzegovina, Bulgarije, Cyprus, Denemarken, Duitsland, Estland, Faeröer, Finland, Frankrijk, Gibraltar, Griekenland, Groenland, Guernsey, Hongarije, IJsland, Ierland en 33 meer ## Functies - 360-gradenfeedback - Beheer van functioneringsgesprekken - Beoordelingen door collega's - Evaluatiecyclus tracken - Goal Setting/Tracking - Vaardigheidsbeoordeling ## Integraties (21 in totaal) - ADP iHCM - AFAS Software - BambooHR - HR4YOU - Hailey HR - HeavenHR - HiBob - Leapsome - Loket.nl - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Entra ID - Nibelis - Nmbrs - Officient - Payfit ... en 6 meer integraties ## Ondersteuningsopties - E-mail/helpdesk - Veelgestelde vragen/forum - Kennisbank - Telefonische ondersteuning - Chatten ## Categorie - [Performance management systemen](https://www.capterra.be/directory/30061/performance-appraisal/software) ## Alternatieven 1. [Paylocity](https://www.capterra.be/software/86714/webpay) — 4.3/5 (1928 reviews) 2. [BambooHR](https://www.capterra.be/software/110968/bamboohr) — 4.6/5 (3551 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.be/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13651 reviews) 4. [Rippling](https://www.capterra.be/software/172127/rippling) — 4.9/5 (4862 reviews) 5. [AssessTEAM](https://www.capterra.be/software/153662/assessteam-employee-evaluation-on-the-cloud) — 4.6/5 (221 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Meer controle over prestaties en opvolging." — 4.0/5 > **Mieke** | *26 januari 2026* | Automotive | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Learned brengt structuur aan in functioneringsgesprekken en helpt om afspraken en feedback beter vast te leggen. Dit maakt opvolging eenvoudiger en zorgt voor meer duidelijkheid over verwachtingen en ontwikkelingsmogelijkheden. > > **Minpunten**: De beste lay-out vereist enige coördinatie. Extra voorbeeldworkflows/sjablonen voor elk type gesprek zouden het voor alle gebruikers nog gemakkelijker maken. > > We wilden meer consistentie in de gesprekken, betere documentatie en een concretere opvolging. Learned helpt ons dit proces overzichtelijk te organiseren en geeft HR en managers meer controle, terwijl medewerkers meer duidelijkheid krijgen over ontwikkelingspunten en vervolgstappen. ----- ### "More consistent evaluations and greater control for HR" — 4.0/5 > **Lise** | *30 januari 2026* | Voedselproductie | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Learned provides managers with more guidance through structure and clear guidelines for evaluation and development interviews. This makes evaluations more consistent and less dependent on the individual manager. For HR, it provides more insight into what is going on and what has been agreed upon, without having to attend every meeting to keep track of things. > > **Minpunten**: The ultimate effect remains partly dependent on how consistently managers use it. Additional templates or best practice flows for each type of conversation would help to accelerate adoption even further and reduce differences even more. > > We were looking for a way to standardize evaluations, give managers more tools, and better document follow-up on development. Learned helps us with the implementation: more structure, better documentation, and more insight for HR. You clearly see the greatest effect in teams where it has been well adopted. ----- ### "Helps a growing company bring structure to development and conversations" — 5.0/5 > **Eefje** | *3 april 2026* | Managementconsulting | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: We’re in a growth phase, and for us “keeping people engaged” isn’t a slogan, it’s something we have to organize properly. We used to do a lot in Word and separate documents, and honestly it was getting chaotic. You can’t really steer on development or follow-up when everything lives in different files. Learned gives us one place for the conversation cycle and the follow-up. What I like is that it helps make growth steps more visible, especially the junior–medior–senior path. Junior colleagues often ask very practical questions like: what does good look like? and what’s next?, and this makes it easier to answer that consistently. It also helps new managers. We’re adding a new management layer and they don’t all have years of experience in running these talks. Having a clear structure gives them confidence and keeps the quality more stable. > > **Minpunten**: It’s a fairly full-featured tool, which is great, but it also means you have to make decisions during setup. If you’re implementing while growing fast, it can feel like you’re building the plane while flying it. We got there, but a few more starter templates for fast-growing organizations would’ve saved us some puzzling at the beginning. > > Positive. It brought calm to something that was getting harder to manage with spreadsheets and Word docs. It didn’t eliminate the need for good management, but it made the process easier to run and easier to follow up on. People know better what’s expected, junior employees have clearer frames for development, and managers have a structure they can actually use. ----- ### "More structure and insight into performance, with a desire for more flexible peer feedback settings" — 5.0/5 > **Nanette** | *10 februari 2026* | Machinebouw | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Learned helps make evaluations more consistent and less dependent on individual managers. It better records agreements and feedback, making follow-up and development more concrete. HR gains more insight and overview and has less ad hoc operational work to do. Employees gain more clarity about development opportunities, which can contribute to engagement and retention > > **Minpunten**: We would like to be able to flexibly set within a single template whether peer feedback is requested for a selection of employees. Currently, we often work with two templates.In addition, it would be nice if peer feedback could be made optionally visible in the 9-grid. > > We came from a situation with little ongoing feedback, differences in evaluations per manager, and limited follow-up. This made the process time-consuming for managers and caused HR to get bogged down in operational work with too little insight. Employees had little insight into development, and retention became more difficult across the organization. Learned brings structure, documentation, and insight, improving performance reviews and making follow-up clearer. ----- ### "Structure and transparency in performance reviews, with room for further career development" — 4.0/5 > **Karin** | *25 februari 2026* | Veeteelt | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Learned makes expectations and evaluations more transparent by bringing more structure to the performance process. Managers are given better tools for substantive discussions, and it becomes easier to record agreements and points discussed. This gives employees more clarity about their development and enables HR to better manage succession and consistency, even across teams/regions. > > **Minpunten**: We would like to see an even more comprehensive career module, with more advanced career paths and more opportunities to model growth per position/target group. > > We faced challenges around transparency of expectations, guidance for managers, and consistent recording. This meant that managers sometimes felt they had little impact and employees had less insight into development opportunities; we saw lower engagement among some groups (e.g., certain positions/regions). Learned helps to structure the process and improve recording and follow-up, making the conversation and the development side more concrete. ----- Pagina: 1 / 2\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.capterra.be/software/1080743/Learned?page=2) ## Links - [Bekijk op Capterra](https://www.capterra.be/software/1080743/Learned) ## Deze pagina is beschikbaar in de volgende talen | Locatie | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Gestructureerde gegevens